Patients & CaregiversHealthcare Professionals - Opens new windowWorldwide - Opens new window
HomeAbout Merck Products Newsroom Investor Relations CareersResearchLicensingThe Merck Manuals

The Merck Manual of Geriatrics logo
red line
click here to go to the Contents page of The Merck Manual of Geriatrics
click here to go to the title page of The Merck Manual of Geriatrics
click here to search The Merck Manual of Geriatrics
click here to go to the Index of The Merck Manual of Geriatrics
red line
Section 1. Basics of Geriatric Care
Chapter 14. Legal and Ethical Issues
Topics:    Introduction | Capacity | Competence | Informed Consent | Confidentiality and Disclosure | Advance Directives | Surrogate Decision Making | Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders | Withholding of Food and Fluid | Euthanasia, Assisted Suicide, and Palliation | Discharge and Placement | Long-Term Care

red line

Euthanasia, Assisted Suicide, and Palliation

Euthanasia, an action taken by a health care practitioner intended to result in a patient's death, is illegal in the USA. Some patients whose life expectancy is reduced and who are suffering severely request euthanasia. Traditionally, euthanasia has been forbidden in medical practice, and purposeful intervention to end life disturbs most physicians and patients. However, in certain clinical situations involving hopelessness and suffering, death is the end of pain, not of meaningful life.

Assisted suicide, an action taken by a patient intended to cause his own death with drugs supplied by a physician, is illegal in all states except Oregon. Physicians can provide treatment intended to minimize physical and emotional suffering, even if a secondary result is the shortening of life, but they cannot specifically intend to hasten death.

The issue of palliation, or pain relief, is inextricable from that of assisted suicide for two reasons: (1) many dying patients have unrelieved pain or other intolerable symptoms, and (2) most patients requesting assisted suicide do not want to die; they just want the suffering to stop. The U.S. Supreme Court has emphasized the relevance and importance of the doctrine of double effect, which states that an intervention intended to relieve pain but that incidentally hastens death is still appropriate. If the physician's goal is to relieve suffering, then the action is protected.

Contact Merck Site MapPrivacy PolicyTerms of UseCopyright 1995-2008 Merck & Co., Inc.