NEWSROOM
U.S. Supreme Court Affirms Lower Court Decision on Merck Federal Securities Class Action |
WHITEHOUSE STATION, N.J., April 27, 2010 – Merck announced today that it is disappointed with the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to affirm a lower court’s ruling on when the statute of limitations began to run in a federal securities class action against the company and certain of its officers and directors. The effect of the ruling is to return the case to federal district court in New Jersey for further proceedings. “Merck is disappointed in today’s decision, but believes that the allegations in the complaint are unfounded and will continue to defend itself vigorously,” said Bruce Kuhlik, Merck Executive Vice President and General Counsel. “The company has already made a motion to dismiss the operative complaint on numerous other grounds, and will renew that motion in the district court.” Kannon K. Shanmugam of Williams & Connolly LLP argued the case before the Supreme Court for Merck. The company is also represented by Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP. Status of Other Litigation Forward Looking Statement The following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ from those set forth in the forward-looking statements: the possibility that the expected synergies from the merger of Merck and Schering-Plough will not be realized, or will not be realized within the expected time period, due to, among other things, the impact of pharmaceutical industry regulation; the risk that the businesses will not be integrated successfully; disruption from the merger making it more difficult to maintain business and operational relationships; Merck’s ability to accurately predict future market conditions; dependence on the effectiveness of Merck’s patents and other protections for innovative products; the risk of new and changing regulation and health policies in the U.S. and internationally and the exposure to litigation and/or regulatory actions. Merck undertakes no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Additional factors that could cause results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements can be found in Merck’s 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K, Schering-Plough’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009, the proxy statement filed by Merck on June 25, 2009 and each company’s other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) available at the SEC’s Internet site: www.sec.gov. |
| # # # |