Kentucky Court Of Appeals Reverses Certification of a Class of Plaintiffs Seeking Reimbursement for Vioxx® Costs
February 10, 2012 8:08 am ET
Merck, known as MSD outside the United States and Canada, today said a
Kentucky appellate court reversed a trial court’s order certifying a
class of consumers who sought reimbursement for out-of-pocket Vioxx
costs.
A unanimous three-judge panel of the Kentucky Court of Appeals ruled
that proceeding with a class-wide trial of plaintiff’s claims would be
inappropriate because “causation, reliance, and damages are required to
be shown on an individual basis,” and that “if the action were tried as
a class…the case would essentially fragment into a series of amalgamated
‘mini-trials.'” The court also pointed out that “class certification is
typically not granted in prescription drug cases because of the
individualized inquiries such litigation typically involves.”
Since the beginning of this case, Merck maintained that proceeding with
plaintiff’s claims on a class-wide basis would not have resulted in a
fair trial because each class member’s circumstances varied. The company
is satisfied with the court’s decision that this was not an appropriate
case to proceed as a class action.
About Merck
Today’s Merck is a global healthcare leader working to help the world be
well. Merck is known as MSD outside the United States and Canada.
Through our prescription medicines, vaccines, biologic therapies, and
consumer care and animal health products, we work with customers and
operate in more than 140 countries to deliver innovative health
solutions. We also demonstrate our commitment to increasing access to
healthcare through far-reaching policies, programs and partnerships. For
more information, visit www.merck.com
and connect with us on Twitter, Facebook and YouTube.
Forward-Looking Statement
This news release includes “forward-looking statements” within the
meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the United States Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements may include,
but are not limited to, statements about the benefits of the merger
between Merck and Schering-Plough, including future financial and
operating results, the combined company’s plans, objectives,
expectations and intentions and other statements that are not historical
facts. Such statements are based upon the current beliefs and
expectations of Merck’s management and are subject to significant risks
and uncertainties. Actual results may differ from those set forth in the
forward-looking statements.
The following factors, among others, could cause actual results to
differ from those set forth in the forward-looking statements: the
possibility that the expected synergies from the merger of Merck and
Schering-Plough will not be realized, or will not be realized within the
expected time period; the impact of pharmaceutical industry regulation
and health care legislation; the risk that the businesses will not be
integrated successfully; disruption from the merger making it more
difficult to maintain business and operational relationships; Merck’s
ability to accurately predict future market conditions; dependence on
the effectiveness of Merck’s patents and other protections for
innovative products; the risk of new and changing regulation and health
policies in the U.S. and internationally and the exposure to litigation
and/or regulatory actions.
Merck undertakes no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking
statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise. Additional factors that could cause results to differ
materially from those described in the forward-looking statements can be
found in Merck’s 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K and the company’s other
filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) available at
the SEC’s Internet site (www.sec.gov).
