NEWSROOM
Merck Argues VIOXX® Case before U.S. Supreme Court |
WHITEHOUSE STATION, N.J., Nov. 30, 2009 – Merck today presented oral arguments in the U.S. Supreme Court in Merck & Co., Inc., v. Richard Reynolds. The original suit, brought by investors in connection with disclosures regarding VIOXX, was dismissed by the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey in 2007, on the ground that the claims were time-barred under the statute of limitations. In 2008, however, a divided Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit reversed the district court’s ruling. Merck believes the district court correctly held that the intense public discussion of data surrounding VIOXX had put investors on inquiry notice of the relevant issues long before Merck became aware of and announced the new scientific information that led to the voluntary withdrawal of VIOXX in 2004. Merck is pleased to have had the opportunity to present its case to the Supreme Court and looks forward to the Court’s decision. Kannon K. Shanmugam of Williams & Connolly LLP argued the case for Merck. Status of Litigation About Merck Forward Looking Statement The following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ from those set forth in the forward-looking statements: the possibility that the expected synergies from the merger of Merck and Schering-Plough will not be realized, or will not be realized within the expected time period, due to, among other things, the impact of pharmaceutical industry regulation and pending legislation that could affect the pharmaceutical industry; the risk that the businesses will not be integrated successfully; disruption from the merger making it more difficult to maintain business and operational relationships; Merck’s ability to accurately predict future market conditions; dependence on the effectiveness of Merck’s patents and other protections for innovative products; the risk of new and changing regulation and health policies in the U.S. and internationally and the exposure to litigation and/or regulatory actions. Merck undertakes no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Additional factors that could cause results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements can be found in Merck’s 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K, Schering-Plough’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009, the proxy statement filed by Merck on June 25, 2009 and each company’s other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) available at the SEC’s Internet site: www.sec.gov. |
| # # # |